Agentforce
Readiness Assessment
Find out which Agentforce use cases are worth building first, and what your data, permissions and automation need before an agent goes live.
Book a discovery callSee case studiesThe Agentforce Readiness Assessment is a structured review by Techila Global Services, a Salesforce Summit partner, of the use cases, data, knowledge, permissions, Trust Layer considerations, existing automation and channels that decide whether an Agentforce agent will work in your org. It ends with a ranked use-case shortlist, a fix list and a plan for a first pilot.
[ The practice ]
Know before you build
Most of the work in a good agent happens before anyone opens the builder: choosing the right job, making sure the knowledge it answers from is current, and deciding exactly what it may touch. Techila, a Salesforce Summit partner and Agentforce Partner Network member headquartered in Frisco, Texas, with delivery from Pune, India, runs the assessment with your business owners, admins and security team.
What is an Agentforce readiness assessment?
An Agentforce readiness assessment checks, before you build, whether a use case is worth automating and whether your org can support it. It reviews value and volume, the data and knowledge the agent would ground on, the agent user's access, Trust Layer considerations, the actions you already have and the channels you would use.
Salesforce notes that agents succeed better with up-to-date, accurate and relevant information, and that agent testing can lengthen an implementation. An assessment finds data and access problems while they are still cheap to fix.
What does the Agentforce readiness assessment examine?
Seven areas: the use-case shortlist and its value, data quality and knowledge for grounding, permissions and agent user access, Einstein Trust Layer considerations, actions available from existing Flows, Apex and APIs, channel fit, and the success measures you will judge the agent by. Each area produces findings and a rating.
| Area | What we examine | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Use cases and value | Candidate processes, their volume, current measures and the value of improving them | A small, frequent, measurable job is the best first agent |
| Data and knowledge | Knowledge articles, files and records the agent would answer from; ownership, duplication and freshness | Answers are only as good as what the agent retrieves |
| Grounding route | Whether Agentforce Data Library over unstructured content is enough, or an advanced Data 360 setup is needed | Data Library needs Data 360 enabled; several sources or real-time data need Data 360 implemented |
| Permissions and agent user | Which user the agent would run as, and the permission sets, objects and fields it would need | External-facing agents run as one dedicated agent user that can read anything it has access to |
| Einstein Trust Layer | Sensitive fields, masking, audit needs and approval steps | Data masking is currently disabled for agents, so access design carries the load |
| Existing actions | Flows, Apex classes, prompt templates and APIs that already do the work | Reusing them shortens the build; flows must be autolaunched with inputs and outputs |
| Channels | Where customers or employees would meet the agent, and how hand-off to people works | Each channel adds setup and testing |
| Success measures | The baseline and target for each shortlisted use case | Without a baseline, a pilot cannot show a result |
How does the assessment judge whether your data is ready?
We sample the knowledge articles, files and records each use case depends on and check them for accuracy, ownership, duplication and gaps. We also confirm whether Data 360 is enabled and which grounding route fits. Content that is out of date or owned by no one goes on the fix list before any build starts.
Trailhead notes that unstructured content such as documents needs preparation before it can be retrieved well. Agentforce Data Library supports Knowledge articles, files and web search; the advanced Data 360 setup joins several sources, including harmonized, zero-copy and real-time data.
How does the assessment cover permissions, actions and the Trust Layer?
We map what the agent would need to read and do, which user it would run as, and which existing Flows, Apex and APIs could become its actions. We then check that plan against the Einstein Trust Layer and your security rules, so sensitive data stays out of reach and every action has an owner.
The rules come from Salesforce. Employee-facing agents use the permissions of the person interacting with them; external-facing agents run as a single dedicated user, and Trailhead advises giving it only the permissions it needs. Flow-based actions must use the Autolaunched Flow (No Trigger) type with at least one input and one output, and a flow's description becomes an instruction for the agent, so names and descriptions are reviewed too.
On the Trust Layer, Trailhead notes that data masking is currently disabled for agents, so we record which controls your security team relies on and what that means for each use case.
What do you receive from the Agentforce readiness assessment?
You receive a ranked use-case shortlist with baselines, a data and knowledge fix list, an agent user and permissions design, an inventory of reusable actions, a Trust Layer and security notes document, a channel recommendation and a pilot plan for the top use case. The deliverables are yours to use with Techila or another partner.
| Deliverable | What it contains | Who uses it |
|---|---|---|
| Ranked use-case shortlist | Candidates scored on value, volume, data readiness and risk, with a baseline for each | Business owners and sponsors |
| Data and knowledge fix list | Articles, files and records to update, merge or retire, and the grounding route | Knowledge managers and data owners |
| Permissions design | The agent user, permission sets and the objects and fields the agent needs | Admins and security |
| Action inventory | Existing Flows, Apex, prompt templates and APIs that can become actions, and the gaps | Admins and developers |
| Trust and security notes | Sensitive data, audit needs, approvals and how the Trust Layer applies | Security and compliance |
| Channel recommendation | The first channel and how hand-off to people would work | Service or sales operations |
| Pilot plan | Scope, success measures, test approach and exit criteria for a first agent | The project sponsor |
Who should take part in the assessment?
A business owner for each candidate use case, a Salesforce admin, someone who owns the knowledge base, a developer or architect who knows your Flows, Apex and integrations, and a member of your security or compliance team. A sponsor who can approve the pilot should join the readout.
How does the assessment lead into a pilot?
The pilot plan in the assessment becomes the brief for the Agentforce Pilot: one use case, one channel, a baseline, a test approach and exit criteria. Fixes from the data and permissions lists are made first, so the pilot starts on a ready org rather than discovering problems mid-build.
From assessment to a first agent
- Scoping callAgree the candidate use cases, attendees and scope.
- AssessmentReview the seven areas with your team.
- ReadoutShortlist, fix lists and pilot plan presented to the sponsor.
- FixesData, knowledge and permission changes made.
- PilotA first agent on one use case and one channel.
How long does the assessment take and what does it cost?
Scope, duration and price are set in a scoping call, because they depend on how many use cases and teams are involved and how much of the org has to be reviewed. Agentforce licence and usage costs are separate; see the Agentforce pricing guide and the Agentforce cost calculator. To arrange the call, contact Techila.
[ Capabilities ]
What does the assessment cover?
Everything that decides whether a first agent will work, reviewed before the build.
Everything that decides whether a first agent will work, reviewed before the build.
[ Delivery process ]
How does the assessment run?
Scope it, review the org with your team, then present the findings and the pilot plan.
[ Proof ]
Recent programmes.
All case studies →[ FAQ ]
Agentforce readiness questions.
What teams ask before they commit to a first agent.
A review of candidate use cases and their value, the data and knowledge for grounding, the agent user's permissions, Einstein Trust Layer considerations, existing Flows, Apex and APIs, channel fit and success measures, ending in a ranked shortlist, fix lists and a pilot plan.
No. The assessment checks whether Data 360 is enabled and which grounding route each use case needs. Agentforce Data Library needs Data 360 enabled; grounding in several sources or real-time data needs Data 360 implemented.
Both are set in a scoping call, because they depend on the number of use cases, teams and systems involved. Agentforce licence and usage costs are separate.
A business owner for each use case, a Salesforce admin, the knowledge owner, a developer or architect, someone from security or compliance, and a sponsor for the readout.
No. The deliverables are yours. Many teams continue into the Agentforce Pilot with Techila because the pilot plan is already written, but the findings work with any partner or internal team.
Then the fix list is the next step: knowledge, data or permission changes that make a use case ready. Finding that before a build is cheaper than finding it during one.
Sources
Last reviewed:
- Trailhead, Learn the basics of grounding (read 10 November 2026)
- Trailhead, Enable trusted agents with Data 360 (read 10 November 2026)
- Trailhead, Make your flows agent-ready (read 10 November 2026)
- Trailhead, Meet the Einstein Trust Layer (read 10 November 2026)
- Salesforce, How does Agentforce work? (read 10 November 2026)
- Salesforce, CRM implementation: a 9-step guide (read 10 November 2026)
- Salesforce AppExchange, Techila Global Services consulting listing (read 10 November 2026)
Let's now look at how to build
the next 10 years of
your customer platform.
